Written in plain language, without jargon.
A substantial body of research, including randomised trials and meta-analyses, has compared video-delivered psychotherapy with in-person delivery for depression and anxiety disorders. The general finding is comparable outcomes across the two formats. This has been studied for over a decade and the evidence base expanded considerably after 2020.
The active ingredients of therapy — the working relationship, accurate assessment, structured technique and between-session practice — transfer to video largely intact. The therapeutic alliance, which is one of the strongest predictors of outcome, forms reliably over video for most people.
Access is the main one: people in smaller cities and towns can reach qualified therapists who simply aren't available locally. It also removes commute time, reduces cost, and offers privacy that a clinic waiting room cannot. Continuity is better too, since travel, relocation and illness disrupt sessions far less.
Acute suicidal crisis, active psychosis, severe eating disorders requiring medical monitoring, significant substance withdrawal, and situations where someone is unsafe at home. In these cases in-person or emergency care is necessary, and a responsible therapist will say so rather than continuing online.
| Anxiety, panic, phobias | Well supported online |
| Depression, mild to moderate | Well supported online |
| Stress, burnout, work difficulties | Well suited to online |
| Relationship and family concerns | Well suited to online |
| Acute crisis or risk to life | In-person / emergency services |
| Severe eating disorders | In-person with medical oversight |
Book a short exploratory call. No commitment — just a conversation to work out what would help.
Book a sessionOther areas people often explore alongside this.